The John Trigg Ester Library

Special Membership Meeting 6/13/2010

Agenda:

Roll Call, Minutes

Officers' Reports

Nonprofit Application Update

Bylaws Amendments:

  • alternate board members
  • geographic relationship of majority of board to area served
  • notices of members' meetings
  • dissolution clause

Construction & Design Update:

  • Alaska legislative appropriation
  • US Senate appropriation
  • design simplification
  • fire marshall review
  • site-clearing and construction
  • gazebo construction 2010

Announcements:

  • next library lecture: June
  • LiBerry Music Festival (updates)

 

MINUTES

Special membership meeting of the John Trigg Ester Library

June 13, 2010
Hartung Hall, Ester

Call to Order: 6:45 pm

(note: meeting start delayed until quorum present)

Attendees: Kate Billington, Greta Burkart, Nancy Burnham, Amy Cameron, Tania Clucas, Emily Decker, Roy Earnest, Eric Glos, Judie Gumm, Melinda Harris, Deirdre Helfferich, Merritt Helfferich (via proxy), Rick Kruse, Hans Mölders, Mali Noreen, Margaret Rogers, Trey Simmons, Mark Simpson

President announced dues and requirement to be current member in order to vote.

Officers’ Reports:

President’s Report: (attached, read to membership)

Treasurer’s Report:

Checking: $2,914.30

Savings: $17,115.38

$2,000 payment to be made to ECA on land, two $100 payments made (one each in May and June)

Nonprofit Application Update:

President updated membership on status of application for federal nonprofit status, assignments of board members and brief explanation of some of the parts of the application.

Bylaws Amendments:

President explained purpose of meeting (vote on bylaws, quick updates). A few copies of the bylaws amendments (attached) were passed out to the members.

President read amendment #1. Minimal discussion.

ACTION: Moved and seconded to accept.

VOTE: Passed, one nay.

President read amendment #2.

ACTION: Question called by Amy Cameron

VOTE: passed unanimously

President read amendment #3. Some discussion.

ACTION: Question called by Amy Cameron

VOTE: Passed unanimously.

President read amendment #4. Extended discussion.

ACTION: Moved by Eric Glos and seconded by Amy Cameron to amend, to insert language after the phrase “assets shall be distributed” the proviso “according to a majority vote of a quorum of the JTEL membership”

VOTE: Passed unanimously.

ACTION: Moved by Mark Simpson and seconded by ? to amend, to insert language after the phrase “the residual assets” the proviso, "excluding real assets, which shall revert to the noteholder,”

VOTE: Passed, with 1 abstention and 4 nays

Revised amendment to read:

In the event of dissolution of the corporation, no part of the corporation's earnings or assets shall inure to the benefit of any of its members; after payment of any debts, the residual assets, excluding real assets, which shall revert to the noteholder, of the corporation shall be distributed to the Ester Community Association if and only if that entity is exempt as an organization described in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or corresponding sections of any prior or future law. If the Ester Community Association is not exempt as described at the time of the dissolution of the corporation, then the assets shall be distributed according to a majority vote of the JTEL membership to one or more exempt organizations whose mission is complementary to that of the JTEL, or to the federal, state, or local government for exclusive public purpose.

ACTION: Question on revised amendment called by Amy Cameron

VOTE: Passed unanimously

Construction & Design Updates:

President updated membership:

On status of appropriations: federal appropriation in Senator Begich’s request, now (apparently) in committee; state appropriation granted, but not yet known whether it will be a pass-through via the Fairbanks North Star Borough or a direct grant from the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development. Information is pending from Senator Thomas and/or Representative Guttenberg’s office.

On status of design: JTEL board decided to simplify, if feasible, the building design by eliminating the second storey. According to the architects, this is easily done and will reduce the cost by 30–40%, and will increase the area for the collections and make possible a more aesthetically pleasing structure at less cost.

Considerable discussion ensued at this point. Mark Simpson raised several concerns relating to cost inflation due to working with architects, time span during fundraising and construction, and the design itself. He urged the membership not to go the route that the Ester Volunteer Fire Department followed, which resulted in a significant cost increase over the ten years it took to design, raise funds for, and finally construct the expansion; he urged that instead the JTEL follow the pattern set down by the park, of coming in under budget and under time constraint (Simpson received applause from the members at this point), and recommended going for a smaller, cheaper, quickly built structure such as a log house kit. He cautioned against the strings associated with federal grants in particular, describing how there were many builders from the community willing to work for free or cheaply on the fire station, but that they couldn’t volunteer due to the constraints associated with the general contractor and the federal grant strictures. He said that many more in the community would be willing to support the library if it was more modest, and that “Ester needs a $1.7 million library like a fish needs a [expletive] bicycle.”

Hans Mölders said that design meetings had been going on since 2006, and that during that time is when these anonymous people with concerns about the design should have participated. Simpson said that he had raised his hand and said the building was going to be expensive at every ECA meeting where the library committee reported on the design progress.

Deirdre Helfferich said that with the revised design would come a new estimate, and the board had decided to go through it and figure out line by line which items could be obtained for reduced price or for free, so as to get an accurate assessment of the true dollar cost of the building. Apparently part of the reason we received the state grant is that we had a green (sustainable) design.

Eric Glos reminded the membership that nothing was in stone at this point, it was all only on paper, but that, as construction worker, he could attest that even with simplifying the design and reducing costs, the library was going to cost bucks. He said that a kit would not be sufficient—the building had to meet the needs of the community, but that some kind of middle ground could be reached. As to contracting, the JTEL could contract parts out, such as building the shell, and then others could come in to help finish the library as volunteers after the contractor was done. The contractor would want their own crew for their part.

On the status of the fire marshal’s review: the older design is in the hands of the fire marshal, but not actually in the review process yet, so can be switched out with the revised plan. Once the review is completed, the library has six months to start construction, with a six-month extension possible.

On site preparation: the JTEL could go ahead with general site preparation right now without waiting for the state grant. The state appropriation is for design and early construction, not just design.

On the gazebo: the only construction project we are in a position to finish this year is that of the gazebo. Work parties will be announced.

Announcements:

The next library lecture will be in July, rather than June (too much going on this month).

The Li-Berry Music Festival is August 21, Saturday, volunteers are needed. Mali Noreen volunteered to help emcee again.

ADJOURNED: 7:45 pm

library dog

item3d1

contactbutton

item3d1b

item3d1b2

friendsbutton

item3d1a


home
meetings
library home